RESUMEN
Mental health is inextricably linked to both poverty and future life chances such as education, skills, labour market attachment and social function. Poverty can lead to poorer mental health, which reduces opportunities and increases the risk of lifetime poverty. Cash transfer programmes are one of the most common strategies to reduce poverty and now reach substantial proportions of populations living in low- and middle-income countries. Because of their rapid expansion in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, they have recently gained even more importance. Recently, there have been suggestions that these cash transfers might improve youth mental health, disrupting the cycle of disadvantage at a critical period of life. Here, we present a conceptual framework describing potential mechanisms by which cash transfer programmes could improve the mental health and life chances of young people. Furthermore, we explore how theories from behavioural economics and cognitive psychology could be used to more specifically target these mechanisms and optimise the impact of cash transfers on youth mental health and life chances. Based on this, we identify several lines of enquiry and action for future research and policy.Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.
RESUMEN
Background Cardiac rehabilitation is accessed by only ~50% of eligible patients. Virtual options have become more important since Covid. The Our Hearts Our Minds (OHOM) programme used wearable technology (Fitbit) for virtual physical activity monitoring. Aim To examine whether a Fitbit smartwatch/dashboard component was an acceptable option to improve physical activity levels in the absence of supervised exercise classes. Methods Initial multidisciplinary assessments were conducted via telephone/video as per patient preference. Patients were offered a Fitbit, if they did not have their own smartwatch and to synchronise to a cloud based dashboard visible to the clinical team. Using behaviour change techniques, tailored physical activity advice was provided including personalised notifications pushed to the patient's Fitbit app. Patients also received coaching calls and virtual group education sessions. Average daily step count and active minutes (over a 7 day period) were calculated at the start and end of programme. Results 1066 referrals were received from 01/04/20 to 30/ 03/22, of which 1043 patients (98%) had an initial assessment. Of these, 407 wore a Fitbit device (33% provided by programme, 6% own Fitbit) and synchronised to OHOM Fitbit dashboard (39% uptake). 6% had their own non-Fitbit smartwatch. 55% declined Fitbit (5% didn't own a smartphone for app download or access the internet, 3% weren't interested in technology, 2% medical reasons, 2% didn't collect, 43% weren't interested in virtual monitoring). Physical activity outcomes pre and post programme are shown in table 1. Conclusion Fitbit (and other) smartwatches coupled with centralised monitoring provided a viable alternative to supervised exercise classes in approximately half of those attending cardiac rehabilitation with evidence of increased physical activity.
RESUMEN
Mitigating the COVID-19 related disruptions in mental health care services is crucial in a time of increased mental health disorders. Numerous reviews have been conducted on the process of implementing technology-based mental health care during the pandemic. The research question of this umbrella review was to examine what the impact of COVID-19 was on access and delivery of mental health services and how mental health services have changed during the pandemic. A systematic search for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted up to August 12, 2022, and 38 systematic reviews were identified. Main disruptions during COVID-19 were reduced access to outpatient mental health care and reduced admissions and earlier discharge from inpatient care. In response, synchronous telemental health tools such as videoconferencing were used to provide remote care similar to pre-COVID care, and to a lesser extent asynchronous virtual mental health tools such as apps. Implementation of synchronous tools were facilitated by time-efficiency and flexibility during the pandemic but there was a lack of accessibility for specific vulnerable populations. Main barriers among practitioners and patients to use digital mental health tools were poor technological literacy, particularly when preexisting inequalities existed, and beliefs about reduced therapeutic alliance particularly in case of severe mental disorders. Absence of organizational support for technological implementation of digital mental health interventions due to inadequate IT infrastructure, lack of funding, as well as lack of privacy and safety, challenged implementation during COVID-19. Reviews were of low to moderate quality, covered heterogeneously designed primary studies and lacked findings of implementation in low- and middle-income countries. These gaps in the evidence were particularly prevalent in studies conducted early in the pandemic. This umbrella review shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, practitioners and mental health care institutions mainly used synchronous telemental health tools, and to a lesser degree asynchronous tools to enable continued access to mental health care for patients. Numerous barriers to these tools were identified, and call for further improvements. In addition, more high quality research into comparative effectiveness and working mechanisms may improve scalability of mental health care in general and in future infectious disease outbreaks.